Skip to main content

Looking for Valuant? You are in the right place!

Valuant is now Abrigo, giving you a single source to Manage Risk and Drive Growth

Make yourself at home – we hope you enjoy your new web experience.

Looking for DiCOM? You are in the right place!

DiCOM Software is now part of Abrigo, giving you a single source to Manage Risk and Drive Growth. Make yourself at home – we hope you enjoy your new web experience.

Looking for TPG Software? You are in the right place!

TPG Software is now part of Abrigo. You can continue to count on the world-class Investment Accounting software and services you’ve come to expect, plus all that Abrigo has to offer.

Make yourself at home – we hope you enjoy being part of our community.

Comparing stress test approaches

Stress testing is a crucial component of asset/liability management (ALM), helping financial institutions assess their resilience in uncertain conditions. Two primary approaches—sensitivity and scenario stress testing—offer different insights into financial risk. Sensitivity stress testing isolates changes in key variables, such as interest rates or deposit decay rates, to measure their impact on balance sheet performance. In contrast, scenario stress testing evaluates the combined effects of multiple adverse conditions, such as a severe recession or liquidity crisis, to gauge overall financial stability.

Understanding the differences between these approaches allows community banks and credit unions to refine ALM models, improve decision-making, and meet regulatory expectations. By incorporating both methods, institutions can proactively identify vulnerabilities and strengthen risk management strategies.

Download to learn:

  • How sensitivity and scenario stress testing differ in ALM
  • When to use each approach to enhance financial resilience
  • Key steps to performing effective stress tests
  • Actionable insights for improving liquidity and capital planning