Skip to main content

Looking for Valuant? You are in the right place!

Valuant is now Abrigo, giving you a single source to Manage Risk and Drive Growth

Make yourself at home – we hope you enjoy your new web experience.

Looking for DiCOM? You are in the right place!

DiCOM Software is now part of Abrigo, giving you a single source to Manage Risk and Drive Growth. Make yourself at home – we hope you enjoy your new web experience.

Looking for TPG Software? You are in the right place!

TPG Software is now part of Abrigo. You can continue to count on the world-class Investment Accounting software and services you’ve come to expect, plus all that Abrigo has to offer.

Make yourself at home – we hope you enjoy being part of our community.

Portfolio Risk & CECL Allowance Calculation CECL Accounting Incurred Loss

Key Considerations Tied to the Pandemic and CECL, Allowance-Related Issues

Paula S. King, CPA
June 1, 2020
Read Time: 0 min

Key Takeaways

  1. CFOs have numerous considerations related to the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on the allowance for credit losses, whether it is calculated under the incurred-loss model or CECL.
  2. For lenders reporting under both the expected-loss and incurred-loss models, an increase in loan workouts or modifications may wind up as unwanted impacts on the allowance.
  3. CFOs will also need to adjust both current qualitative as well as forecast conditions to reflect the deteriorating economic conditions seen over the last few months and, no doubt, likely to continue.

The last three months have brought Chief Financial Officers at community financial institutions an influx of new considerations, work responsibilities, and challenges. As if CFOs didn’t have enough to focus on already with reporting tied to financials, asset/liability management, strategic planning, and enhancing the bottom line, the pandemic stormed in as 2020 was off to a solid start. No one would have guessed that after the longest economic expansion in U.S. history, we would experience a health crisis that has affected our lives and economy so quickly and dramatically. Along with this has come the SBA’s Paycheck Protection Program with all its nuances and requirements of financial institutions, which has brought new and different concerns to bank CFOs as they support local businesses throughout this uncertain time.

Given the many competing priorities, CECL, the long-awaited current expected credit loss Accounting Standard Update, has likely taken a back seat at many institutions. However, given that the actual effective date for CECL has not been delayed, CFOs of SEC-registered banks that had implemented CECL on Jan. 1 must remain mindful of the pandemic’s impact. Even banks that remain on the incurred-loss model and have a 2023 deadline should not lose sight of CECL. With 2020 disrupted by the PPP and other efforts to help small business customers stay afloat, a bank’s previous timeline for assessing data gaps and taking other steps to be prepared by 2023 could face serious delays without a concerted effort to get back on track.

CFOs have numerous considerations related to the impact of the pandemic on the allowance, whether it is calculated under the incurred-loss model or CECL. Here are a few related to CECL implementation, loan modifications, and qualitative or forecast components.

CECL delay and updates

The CECL effective date is not delayed, nor have effective dates for CECL adoption been changed. Rather, financial institutions that adopted CECL as of Q1 2020 have an option to delay the presentation of the impact of CECL on their financial statements. The CARES Act in March allowed the presentation delay until the earlier of the end of the pandemic (yet to be defined) or Dec. 31.

Financial institutions will need to continue to run their CECL calculations throughout 2020 in order to determine the impact and retroactive adjustments necessary. Banks will need to restate the allowance for the periods from Q1 2020 up to the end of the delay.

For banks calculating the allowance for loan and lease losses (ALLL), 2023 remains the deadline, despite calls for additional CECL implementation delays. Administratively, CFOs will need to balance their time between handling the pandemic-related issues of 2020 and staying on track with institutional goals for completing data analysis, selecting methodologies, validating models, and making adjustments over the next 31 months.

Get support on coronavirus-related issues

Speak to a specialist

Loan modifications and workouts

For lenders reporting under both the expected-loss and incurred-loss models, an increase in loan workouts or modifications may wind up as unwanted impacts on the allowance. With the pandemic, the PPP, and deferments of P&I payments for three months, six months and some longer, workouts will loom on the horizon over the next couple of years. It is inevitable given the impact of the pandemic. Consider the number of business closures in your service area, the designation of essential and non-essential businesses, the slow pace of business re-openings, and the variations in re-opening timelines by state, depending on the stage of the pandemic.

These workouts may be large and more than we have seen in recent years, considering that workouts have been minimal or isolated to specific borrower circumstances.

It will be necessary for credit professionals to gear up their workout area and dust off their policies and procedures, but how will these workouts impact the allowance? The impact will be felt in an increase in troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) – nonperforming at first until a track record of payments is achieved, but still a TDR, nonetheless. This will require an analysis of the concessions granted in the modification agreement and most likely, a discounted cash flow analysis, due to the concessions, to determine the value of the loan. If similar concessions are granted pursuant to a loan modification program for certain types of loans, alternatively, these loans may be pooled with a reserve calculated at the pool-level. Keep in mind that the concessions would typically need to be part of an overall program for these loans that are selected for pooling.

A caveat to this normal treatment is that because of the pandemic, regulators and the FASB have agreed that short-term loan modifications tied to the pandemic do not have to immediately count as troubled-debt restructurings. That creates another layer of complexity in determining TDRs.

Qualitative and forecast components

Less than four months ago, financial institutions were experiencing minimal losses and problem loan trends, and strong economies, so, in theory, their qualitative adjustments, at least for problem loan trends and the economy should have been minimal. Certainly, both current qualitative as well as forecast conditions will require significant adjustments to reflect the deteriorating economic conditions seen over the last few months and, no doubt, likely to continue through the remainder of 2020 and, perhaps, beyond. Banks will likely experience the impact of deteriorating conditions (problem loans) longer than originally predicted in early 2020, so it will be important to consider the longer horizon for the forecasting component in ACL calculations.

With CECL’s life-of-loan concept, the adjustment will be more significant than under the current incurred loss model. This will need to be recognized when adjusting for current and forecasted conditions that are not reflected in quantitative models. Historical models would not support any current conditions and those likely to be experienced, unless the institution has data back to the Great Recession and was negatively impacted by it. The Great Recession resulted from a financial crisis. What is so different about the current crisis is the uncertainty of the end or at least the turning point of a health pandemic that we have not seen in our generation’s time. Until major economic indices, such as unemployment, improve, the CFO will need to reserve for risk associated with current economic conditions as well as risk related to the economists’ forecasts of pertinent indices.

Given deferments, institutions are not currently experiencing stress in their loan portfolios (e.g., non-accruals, significant past-dues). However, as months go by, the CFO should be prepared to make changes to qualitative adjustments and forecasts to accurately reflect conditions and future risks, such as delayed business openings or low consumer support, stress in oil prices and other segments, and industry stresses such as hospitality as well as deferments ending. While counterintuitive, the CFO may want to extend the institution’s forecast horizon, primarily because the loan portfolio may not be impacted until later and this impact will be protracted as deferments and government support programs end.

Blog

2025 Credit portfolio risk and balance-sheet management outlook

Read More
Webinar

Winning the deposit game: Strategies to attract, retain, and lend more

Read More
Blog

3 Risks asset/liability management (ALM) addresses

Read More
About the Author

Paula S. King, CPA

Senior Consultant
Paula King, CPA, is Senior Consultant for Abrigo Advisory Services, assisting financial institutions with CECL, credit processes, model validations, and during COVID, the SBA’s Paycheck Protection Program forgiveness process. A former banker and bank co-founder, she has held executive positions (CFO, Chief Risk Officer and Chief Compliance Officer) and has

Full Bio

About Abrigo

Abrigo enables U.S. financial institutions to support their communities through technology that fights financial crime, grows loans and deposits, and optimizes risk. Abrigo's platform centralizes the institution's data, creates a digital user experience, ensures compliance, and delivers efficiency for scale and profitable growth.

Make Big Things Happen.